TRESPASSERS CONCEALING THEIR CRIMINAL INTENT TO DO DAMAGE TO PROPERTY OR TO INTIMIDATE THE RESIDENT OF PRIVATE PROPERTY IS NOT A CLEVER WAY TO CIRCUMVENT THE LAW. EVEN ATTEMPTING TO HAMPER THE OWNER OR RESIDENT ON HIS PRIVATE PROPERTY IS MALFEASANCE AND THEREFORE IT IS CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR
MY LAND AND MY BUSINESS AND I MYSELF WOULD BE IN MUCH BETTER CONDITION IF TRESPASS LAWS WERE ENFORCED. IF TRESPASS LAWS WERE REALLY AND TRULY ENFORCED MY FIRST HOUSE WOULD NOT BE BURNED DOWN. THE TREES WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN SAWED DOWN AND TRUCKED OFF, THE SOIL WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN STRIPPED FROM MY ONLY FLAT ARABLE LAND. MY HOUSE SITE WOULD NOT BE IN A FLOODING HOLE WITH A HUGE DITCH IN FRONT OF IT WHICH RUNS ALL THE WAY THROUGH MY ONLY FLAT LAND. IF TRESPASS LAWS WERE ENFORCED I WOULD NOT HAVE COLLAPSED WHEN SEVENTEEN PEOPLE CAME ON TO MY OTTER POINT PROPERTY NOR WHEN TWELVE PEOPLE OCCUPIED MY PARKING LOT AT THE ROCKCLIFFE TO FENCE ME OUT OF THE PARK ADJACENT TO IT. I WOULD NOT HAVE HAD MY EX-WIFE COME TO THE HOUSE SHE HAD STRIPPED OF ALL POSSESSIONS AND LEFT PERMANENTLY TWO YEARS EARLIER TO SCRATCH AT MY EYES AND CAUSE ME TO COLLAPSE NOR WOULD MY BROTHER ANDREW HAVE BEEN ABLE TO STORM INTO MY HOUSE AND HIT ME IN THE CHEST WITH A DEADLY TAI CHI BLOW WHICH ENDED MY ABILITY TO PLAY MY