IMPONDERIZATION

IMPONDURATE: CREATE A PONDEROUS LEGAL PROCESS WHICH IS IMPONDERABLE.
THE ONLY WAY TO SUCCEED IS TO HAVE THE OLD BOYS PONDER YOUR CLAIM.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A LAWYER CAN DODGE WORK BY PRACTICING DODGELAW.

Image
PROMISES ARE MADE TO OBEY EVERY LAW BY PERSONS WHO ARE IN A SPECIAL POSITION:THEY ARE LICENSED TO REPRESENT THE CROWN AND DEFENDANTS AND PLAINTIFFS AND RESPONDENTS PLEADING FOR US BEFORE THE COURTS. THEY ARE TO ACCOMPLISH THIS REPRESENTATION ALWAYS ACTING HONORABLY AND HONESTLY AND ALWAYS STRICTLY ADHERING TO THE LAWS OF CANADA AND THE SUPREME COURT RULES AND THE RULES IN THE LAWYER'S HANDBOOK. IN CANADA ALL TRIALS ARE SUPPOSED TO BE A SEARCH FOR THE TRUTH. THE SEARCH FOR AND THE PRESENTING OF THE FACTS IS REQUIRED TO BE SUPPORTED AND ACCOMPLISHED BY ALL OF THE LAWYERS, JUDGES,  AND PEOPLE WHO TESTIFY OR SUBMIT DOCUMENTS.   PREPARING FOR EVERY POSSIBLE SUBMISSION OF EVIDENCE CAN BE  DIFFICULT AND LENGTHY WORK. IN CASES INVOLVING CIVIL LITIGATION AVOIDING THAT WORK CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED BY MAKING BACKROOM DEALS WITH A PREDETERMINED OUTCOME AFTER A CURSORY DISCUSSION PROSECUTING THE INJURED PARTY AS IF THEY WERE ON TRIAL RATHER THAN THE PERPETRATOR OF THE DAMAGE. 
Read more

THE TERRIBLE CORRUPTION OF OUR LEGAL PROCESS CAUSED BY BACKROOM LAWYER AND JUDGE DEALS AND PUTTING INJURED PERSONS ON TRIAL (USING FALSE ALLEGATIONS IN MY CASE,) INSTEAD OF COMPENSATING THEM FOR THEIR LOSS.

Image
The government function, having effective and honest courts has been usurped and corrupted by business associations, the law societies. I KNOW THAT I HAVE NEVER HAD AN HONEST APPRAISAL AND AWARD TO INDEMNIFY ME FOR LOSSES I EXPERIENCED. THERE WAS NEVER, NOT ONCE, IN THE OFFICES OF ICBC OR IN COURT ANY DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF WHAT HAPPENED IN THE MOTOR VEHICLE CRASH. MY INJURY AND LOSS OF PAY FOR WORK WAS NEVER ACKNOWLEDGED. A FALSE CHARACTERIZATION OF MYSELF WAS THE OVERRULING FACTOR WHICH SEEMED TO JUSTIFY DENYING MY CLAIM.   . 
Read more

SOME PEOPLE WILL DODGE THE LAW WITHOUT WORRYING ABOUT IT. I HAVE NO SUCH CONFIDENCE IN EVADING LAW AND REGULATION.

Image
WHEN MY MOTHER SAID SHE WANTED THE $47,500. OF MY MONEY SHE LENT TO MY WIFE PAID BACK IN CASH,"UNDER THE TABLE"  I AGREED TO DO THAT, PAYING 1% OF IT EACH MONTH. THEN MY BROTHER ANDREW CAME TO MY WIFE'S BUSINESS, WHERE I WAS AN UNPAID SLAVE, AND ANNOUNCED THAT MY MOTHER WANTED THE PAYMENTS TO BE INTEREST INSTEAD OF PRINCIPAL REPAYMENT.  I TOLD HIM I WOULD NOT DO THAT, I HAD NOT AGREED TO PAY INTEREST. DESPITE MY PAYING MY OWN MONEY BACK TO MOTHER ANDREW TOOK MORE OF WHAT HE CALLED PRINCIPAL AND MORE INTEREST FROM MY INHERITED MONEY FROM MY FATHER.  THAT IS A DODGING OF THE LAW. THE  INTEREST WOULD HAVE TO BE DECLARED AS INCOME AND IT WAS NOT. WHEN MY EX-WIFE WHINED THAT SHE WANTED HER OWN HOUSE AND WAS GOING TO DIVORCE ME TO GET THAT I OFFERED TO BUILD HER A FREE OF COST HOUSE FROM A BOOK OF 70 HOUSE PLANS WHICH WOULD COST $70,000 FOR EACH OF THEM TO BE BUILT. I SAID I HAD COME UP WITH $30,000 I COULD PUT IN AND MY BROTHER WOULD BUILD IT AND ALSO ALLOW THE USE O...
Read more